Amd Threadripper Vs Intel I9 9900k
Intel Cadre i9 9900K vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
VS
Nosotros compared two desktop CPUs: the 3.6 GHz Intel Core i9 9900K with 8-cores confronting the 3.4 GHz AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X with 16-cores. On this page, you'll find out which processor has improve performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information.
- Review
- Differences
- Performance
- Specs
- Comments
Review
General overview and comparison of the processors
Single-Core Performance
Performance in unmarried-threaded apps and benchmarks
Performance
Measure out performance when all cores are involved
Power Efficiency
The efficiency score of electricity consumption
NanoReview Final Score
Generic CPU rating
Fundamental Differences
What are the key differences betwixt 1950X and 9900K
Advantages of Intel Cadre i9 9900K
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X – 95 vs 180 Watt
- More than 32° C higher critical temperature
- Newer - released ane-yr and 2-months afterwards
- 25% higher Turbo Boost frequency (v GHz vs 4 GHz)
- 24% faster in a single-core Geekbench v5 test - 1277 vs 1030 points
- Includes an integrated GPU Intel UHD Graphics 630
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Supports up to 2048 GB DDR4-2666 RAM
- Has 8 more physical cores
- Has 16 MB larger L3 enshroud size
- Supports quad-aqueduct retentiveness
- Effectually 37.87 GB/south (91%) higher theoretical memory bandwidth
Benchmarks
Comparing the operation of CPUs in benchmarks
Cinebench R23 (Unmarried-Core)
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Passmark CPU (Unmarried-Core)
Passmark CPU (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 (Single-Core)
By purchasing through links on this site, we may receive a commission from Amazon. This does not affect our assessment methodology.
Specifications
Total technical specification of Intel Core i9 9900K and AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
General
| Vendor | Intel | AMD |
| Released | October viii, 2018 | August ten, 2017 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| instruction set | x86-64 | x86-64 |
| Codename | Java Lake | Zen |
| Model number | i9-9900K | - |
| Socket | LGA-1151 | sTR4 |
| Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 | No |
Performance
| Cores | viii | 16 |
| Threads | sixteen | 32 |
| Base Frequency | iii.6 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Turbo Boost Frequency | v GHz | four GHz |
| Bus frequency | 100 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Multiplier | 36x | 34x |
| Jitney Bandwidth | viii GT/s | - |
| L1 Cache | 64K (per core) | 96K (per cadre) |
| L2 Enshroud | 256K (per cadre) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 Cache | 16MB (shared) | 32MB (shared) |
| Unlocked Multiplier | Yes | Yes |
Power
| Transistors | - | 9.6 billions |
| Fabrication process | xiv nm | 14 nm |
| TDP | 95 W | 180 Westward |
| Max. temperature | 100°C | 68°C |
iGPU
| Integrated Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | - |
| GPU Base Clock | 350 MHz | - |
| GPU Heave Clock | 1200 MHz | - |
| Shading Units | 192 | - |
| TMUs | 24 | - |
| ROPs | 3 | - |
| Execution Units | 24 | - |
| TGP | fifteen Westward | - |
| Max. Resolution | 4096x2304 - lx Hz | - |
Retention support
| Memory types | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-2666 |
| Memory Size | 128 GB | 2048 GB |
| Max. Memory Channels | two | 4 |
| Max. Memory Bandwidth | 41.half-dozen GB/due south | 79.47 GB/s |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
Misc
| Official site | Intel Cadre i9 9900K official page | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X official folio |
| PCI Express Version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express Lanes | sixteen | sixty |
| Extended instructions | SSE4.i, SSE4.2, AVX-2 | - |
Cast your vote
Cull between 2 processors
Full votes: 4
Сompetitors
So which CPU will you choose: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X or Intel Core i9 9900K?
Source: https://nanoreview.net/en/cpu-compare/intel-core-i9-9900k-vs-amd-ryzen-threadripper-1950x

0 Response to "Amd Threadripper Vs Intel I9 9900k"
Post a Comment